Which statement is true regarding the measures implemented by commanders based on the FPCON level?

The statement that commanders only implement measures according to the FPCON level in force is true because FPCON, or Force Protection Condition, levels are specifically designed to guide commanders in determining the security measures that need to be adopted based on the assessed threat level to personnel and assets. Each FPCON level—ranging from normal to the highest levels—corresponds to a defined set of protective measures that are appropriate for various threat situations.

Commanders assess the current threat landscape and then determine the appropriate level of protection needed; they base their actions on the established protocols corresponding to that specific FPCON level. This ensures that security measures are calibrated to match the current threat environment, allowing for a timely and effective response to varying levels of risk. By strictly following the measures associated with the active FPCON level, commanders are able to provide adequate protection while avoiding either under- or over-implementation of security resources.

The other options suggest a misunderstanding of the correlation between FPCON levels and the measures taken. For instance, the notion that measures can be implemented regardless of FPCON level overlooks the structured framework that FPCON levels provide, which is crucial for maintaining an effective security posture. Similarly, the idea that commanders can choose measures