Which group is responsible for a broad range of physical security measures at an installation?

The Force Protection Working Group (FPWG) is specifically tasked with overseeing a wide range of physical security measures necessary to protect personnel, facilities, and resources at an installation. This group's responsibilities encompass developing and implementing policies, coordinating security strategies, and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations that pertain to physical security.

The FPWG focuses on assessing threats, vulnerabilities, and risks to ensure an effective protective posture. This involves collaboration with various stakeholders to create comprehensive plans that address deterrents, security technologies, access controls, and emergency response procedures. The group's approach is holistic, taking into account both physical security aspects and the need for integration with broader emergency management and response plans within the installation.

In contrast, the Threat Working Group generally concentrates on identifying potential threats and risks but does not specifically handle the implementation of physical security measures. The Anti-Terrorism Working Group focuses primarily on strategies to prevent terrorist activities and may not cover the full breadth of physical security needs. C.I. Support Personnel is involved in counterintelligence support rather than the comprehensive physical security strategy needed for installations. Thus, the FPWG is the most appropriate choice to lead initiatives related to physical security at an installation.